EPIC CODE: ADNAR DNA Double-Stranded (dsDNA) Antibodies with Reflex, IgG, Serum
Useful For
Evaluating patients with clinical features or at-risk for systemic lupus erythematosus with additional testing by indirect immunofluorescence to clarify cases of borderline enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results
Testing Algorithm
If the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) result is borderline, then the dsDNA by immunofluorescence will be performed at an additional charge.
Special Instructions
Reporting Name
dsDNA Ab with Reflex, IgG, SSpecimen Type
SerumSpecimen Required
Container/Tube:
Preferred: Serum gel
Acceptable: Red top
Specimen Volume: 0.5 mL
Specimen Minimum Volume
0.35 mL
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Serum | Refrigerated (preferred) | 21 days | |
Frozen | 21 days |
Reject Due To
Gross hemolysis | OK |
Gross lipemia | OK |
Gross icterus | OK |
Clinical Information
Of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-specific antibodies outlined in the immunology domain of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE,(1) antibodies to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is the most common. It is also included in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria (SLICC) for SLE.(2) Detection of IgG antibodies to dsDNA is the most used isotype clinically.(3-5) The diagnostic performance of dsDNA IgG antibodies in SLE is variable and dependent on several factors; notably the immunological method used for their detection, the structure of the DNA, the patient’s disease state (early or active vs inactive) including specific clinical manifestations and demographics.(3-7) Weak-positive dsDNA IgG antibodies have low affinity and low avidity with variable clinical correlations for SLE.(3)
Testing for IgG antibodies to dsDNA is indicated in patients positive for anti-cellular antibody (ie, antinuclear antibody: ANA) homogeneous pattern using HEp-2 substrate by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) along with clinical features compatible with SLE.(1,2,8). A minority of SLE patients may test negative using HEp-2 by IFA for nuclear antibodies.(8,9) Testing antibodies associated with HEp-2 IFA cytoplasmic pattern such as ribosomal P IgG autoantibodies may be useful if features of neuropsychiatric disease are present. Alternatively, patients may be tested for Smith, ribonucleoprotein, SSA-52, and SSA-60 antibodies.(8,9)
The levels of antibodies to dsDNA may fluctuate with SLE disease activity. Increasing antibody levels may be associated with flares while decline or negative results may indicate response to treatment or disease remission.
Reference Values
<30.0 IU/mL (negative)
30.0-75.0 IU/mL (borderline)
>75.0 IU/mL (positive)
Negative is considered normal.
Reference values apply to all ages.
Interpretation
Weak-positive dsDNA IgG antibody results have a low-positive predictive value for SLE.
Negative results do not rule out a diagnosis of SLE.
Cautions
Weak-positive results may not correlate with a diagnosis of SLE. Confirmation with Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), which is more specific for SLE may be useful to make diagnosis in certain circumstances.
A weak-positive dsDNA IgG result by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a CLIFT-negative result may suggest early disease, remission, or false-positive results.
False-positive results are usually of low titers.
A negative result does not exclude a diagnosis of SLE.
Clinical Reference
1. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al: 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930
2. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcon GS, et al: Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64(8):2677-86. doi: 10.1002/art.34473
3. Infantino M, Manfredi M, Merone M, et al: Analytical variability in the determination of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies: the strong need of a better definition of the old and new tests. Immunol Res. 2018 Jun;66(3):340-347. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-8992-9
4. Fox BJ, Hockley J, Rigsby P, Dolman C, Meroni PL, Ronnelid J, et al: A WHO Reference Reagent for lupus (anti-dsDNA) antibodies: international collaborative study to evaluate a candidate preparation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Dec;78(12):1677-1680. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-21584
5. Ambrose N, Morgan TA, Galloway J, et al: Differences in disease phenotype and severity in SLE across age groups. Lupus. 2016 Dec;25(14):1542-1550. doi: 10.1177/0961203316644333
6. Rekvig OP: Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and semantic evidence-based critical analyses of definitions, etiology, and pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:569234. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.569234
7. Bragazzi NL, Watad A, Damiani G, Adawi M, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y: Role of anti-DNA auto-antibodies as biomarkers of response to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: hypes and hopes. Insights and implications from a comprehensive review of the literature. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Nov;19(11):969-978. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1665511
8. Damoiseaux J, Coelho Andrade LE, Carballo OG, et al: Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) perspective. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jul;78(7):879-889. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214436
9. Choi MY, Clarke AE, St Pierre Y, et al: Antinuclear antibody-negative systemic lupus erythematosus in an international inception cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jul;71(7):893-902. doi: 10.1002/acr.23712
Method Description
Confirmatory testing for borderline dsDNA results by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing is performed by immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Autoantibodies in a test sample directed against dsDNA bind to antigens in the substrate placed on the slide-which, in this case, is Crithidia luciliae. Washing removes excess serum from the substrate. Fluorescein-conjugated (FITC) antiserum added to the substrate attaches to the bound autoantibody. After a second washing step to remove excess conjugate, the substrate has a coverslip added, and it is viewed for fluorescent patterns with a fluorescent microscope. Observation of specific fluorescent patterns on the substrate indicates the presence of autoantibodies in the test sample.(Package insert: Bio-Rad Kallestad Crithidia luciliae Substrate. Bio-Rad Laboratories; 06/2015)
Day(s) Performed
Monday through Friday
Report Available
2 to 4 daysSpecimen Retention Time
14 daysPerforming Laboratory

Test Classification
This test has been cleared, approved, or is exempt by the US Food and Drug Administration and is used per manufacturer's instructions. Performance characteristics were verified by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements.CPT Code Information
86225
86225-CRITH (if appropriate)
LOINC Code Information
Test ID | Test Order Name | Order LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
ADNAR | dsDNA Ab with Reflex, IgG, S | 33799-8 |
Result ID | Test Result Name | Result LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
ADNAR | dsDNA Ab with Reflex, IgG, S | 33799-8 |
NY State Approved
YesReflex Tests
Test ID | Reporting Name | Available Separately | Always Performed |
---|---|---|---|
CRITH | dsDNA Ab by Crithidia IFA, IgG, S | No | No |
Method Name
ADNAR: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
CRITH: Indirect Immunofluorescence
Secondary ID
63073Forms
If not ordering electronically, complete, print, and send a General Request (T239) with the specimen.